Vaughn Defense
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
      • Pre-Arrest Defense
      • DUI Defense
      • Public Intoxication
    • Misdemeanors
    • Military Representation
    • Title IX
    • Student Conduct
    • Fraternity and Sorority Defense
    • Auburn University Student Legal Advisory Plan
    • Investigations
    • ROTC Assistance
  • Reviews
  • Video FAQs
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • CALL TODAY(334) 232-9392
  • Menu Menu

CALL TODAY(334) 232-9392

Not Guilty: Fighting Unfair THC Prosecutions in Alabama

Not Guilty: Fighting Unfair THC Prosecutions in Alabama

February 6, 2025/by Vaughn Defense

At Vaughn Defense, we believe that the law matters—and so does holding the State to its burden of proof. That principle was at the heart of a recent case where my client was falsely accused of felony drug possession for simply purchasing what she believed to be a legal product.

The Facts of the Case

My client, a passenger in a vehicle during a routine traffic stop, had her purse searched. Inside, officers found a THC vape pen—one that she had legally purchased from a local store. She immediately told the officer it was a CBD product and even named the store where she had bought it.

Despite her honesty and the legal landscape surrounding hemp products, she was charged with possession of a controlled substance under Ala. Code § 13A-12-212(a)(1), which criminalizes the possession of Schedule I substances—including delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC9), the psychoactive compound in cannabis.

The Legal Issues: What the State Had to Prove

Under Alabama law, THC9 is only illegal if it exceeds 0.3% on a dry weight basis (Ala. Code § 20-2-23(q)). But that wasn’t the only issue. The State also had to prove my client knew she possessed a controlled substance—in other words, that she knew what she had was illegal.

The prosecution faced two major problems:

  1. They had no evidence that the THC9 content exceeded 0.3%. Their forensic expert only testified that the vape contained THC9 but never determined its concentration. Without a dry weight analysis, the State couldn’t establish whether the vape was illegal or perfectly legal under Alabama’s hemp laws.
  2. They couldn’t prove my client knew what she possessed was illegal. She had purchased it at a store that openly sold it, and she told officers exactly where she bought it. Without proof that she knowingly possessed an illegal substance, the State couldn’t meet its burden.

The Defense Argument: Holding the State to Its Burden

From the beginning, my argument was simple: the State had not met its burden of proof.

  • The law does not criminalize all THC products—only those exceeding 0.3%.
  • The prosecution must prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Since the State never tested for THC concentration, they had no evidence that my client committed a crime.
  • The State also had no evidence that my client knew she was possessing an illegal substance.

At the close of the State’s case, I moved for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the prosecution had failed to disprove that the substance met the legal definition of hemp. While the judge denied the motion, he instructed the jury that the State had to prove the THC content was greater than 0.3% as an element of the offense. He also recognized that the State had to prove my client knew she was in possession of an illegal substance. These rulings were critical—they meant that the jury could not simply assume the vape was illegal or that my client knew it was illegal; they had to see actual proof.

The Jury’s Verdict: Not Guilty in 10 Minutes

Once the case was in the jury’s hands, it didn’t take long for them to reach a decision. In just 10 minutes, they returned a unanimous verdict of Not Guilty.

Their reasoning was clear:

The State failed to prove that the vape was illegal. There was no evidence showing the THC content exceeded 0.3%. The State failed to prove that my client knowingly possessed a controlled substance.

If the prosecution cannot meet its burden, the only correct verdict is Not Guilty.

Important Takeaways: Protecting Yourself if You Buy CBD or Delta-8 Products

This case highlights an important lesson for anyone purchasing CBD, Delta-8, or other hemp-derived products in Alabama. The law surrounding these products is still developing, and while they are legally sold in stores, that does not always stop law enforcement from making arrests and prosecutors from pursuing charges.

If you buy CBD or Delta-8 products, you should:

  • Keep your receipt and any packaging that shows the product’s ingredients, THC content, or legal disclaimers.
  • Take note of where you bought it. A store receipt can be strong evidence that you believed the product was legal.
     
  • Be cautious about traveling with these products. Even though they may be legal, misunderstandings with law enforcement can happen, leading to unnecessary legal trouble.

Final Thoughts

While I believe my client should never have been charged, I also recognize that the prosecution must follow the law as they see it. The judge’s instructions in this case were critical in ensuring that the jury fully understood the elements of the offense and that a conviction could not be based on assumptions.

At Vaughn Defense, I believe in fighting back and ensuring that my clients a have the best possible representation when people’s lives and futures are on the line. If you or someone you know has been charged with a THC or hemp-related offense, don’t assume the State has a case—because, as we proved in this trial, they often don’t.

If you’re facing a drug charge in Alabama, contact Vaughn Defense today. I’ll evaluate your case, challenge weak evidence, and fight to protect your rights.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://www.vaughndefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_1494382358-1.jpg 563 1000 Vaughn Defense https://www.vaughndefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/logo.png Vaughn Defense2025-02-06 20:26:592025-02-06 20:27:27Not Guilty: Fighting Unfair THC Prosecutions in Alabama
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Latest Posts

  • What are My Rights During an Auburn Police Encounter?
  • How to Handle False Criminal Accusations: Legal and Emotional Strategies
  • The Importance of Timely Reporting in Auburn Title IX Cases
  • The Role of Character Witnesses in Auburn Criminal Defense Cases
  • Understanding the Juvenile Justice System in Auburn: A Guide for Parents
  • The Role of Expert Witnesses in Auburn Title IX Defense Strategies
  • How to Build a Strong Defense Against Drug Charges
  • The Impact of Alcohol and Drugs on Auburn Title IX Cases

Let Us Help You
With Your Case

(334) 232-9392

Useful Links

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Practice Areas
  • Reviews
  • Video FAQs
  • Blog
  • Contact

Let’s Connect

No representation is made that the quality of legal services is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

© 2026 Vaughn Defense. All Rights Reserved. Site By Too Darn Loud - Digital Marketing
  • Terms
  • Sitemap
Link to: Preparing for a Title IX Hearing: What Auburn Students Need to Know Link to: Preparing for a Title IX Hearing: What Auburn Students Need to Know Preparing for a Title IX Hearing: What Auburn Students Need to KnowPreparing for a Title IX Hearing: What Auburn Students Need to Know Link to: Understanding “Preponderance of Evidence” in Auburn Student Conduct Cases Link to: Understanding “Preponderance of Evidence” in Auburn Student Conduct Cases Understanding "Preponderance of Evidence" in Auburn Student Conduct CasesUnderstanding “Preponderance of Evidence” in Auburn Student Conduct...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top